For the first time in the history of political conventions, a vice presidential
candidate in St. Paul, Minn., upstaged the top of the ticket. And those of us who have
suffered through eight years of Republican incompetence in Washington and want to see it
end must face that new reality. The Democrats must find a way to stop Sarah “The
Barracuda” Palin.
Palin has everybody talking, while John McCain has everybody yawning. Columnist and
blogger Mickey Kaus suggests the best way to deal with Palin is to ignore her. I think
that train already left the station. The Barracuda is swimming in our election pool and
she is not just going to go away easily.
Here’s another reality for you: Don’t ever underestimate your opponent and the
Democrats are in danger of doing just that. Palin is not some pretty, empty-headed piece
of fluff. She may look like the cosmetics salesperson at Macy’s, as The New Republic’s
Martin Peretz jokes, but she’s ambitious, smart and a quick study. If you think Palin
will wilt under the pressure of a debate with Joe Biden or a “Meet the Press” appearance
think again. You are being set up for a letdown. An intimidated media is already telling
us it has low expectations for Palin. Low expectations means you can already write the
headline after her debate with the better-qualified, more-experienced Biden: “Palin
holds her own in debate.”
The Barracuda didn’t become governor of Alaska by doing an Elizabeth Hasselbeck
impression. She did it because, as thin as her resumé is, she’s practiced in the ways of
the political world and getting more confident all the time. Don’t get fooled into
thinking because voters don’t normally vote based on the vice president that will happen
this time around. These aren’t normal times and Sarah is a game-changer.
All is not lost. The Democrats have the weapon to hook The Barracuda before she steals
this election for the Republicans who so richly deserve to be sent packing. That weapon
is Hillary Clinton.
I know what you Hillary fans are going to say. She was done wrong being denied the
nomination. Why should she help Barack Obama become president and thereby probably lose
any chance to ever become president? To borrow a line — how about “country first?”
This is the ultimate test for Hillary to back up her marvelous speech at the
Democrats’ convention. Does she really believe in the face of four or possibly eight
more years of ruinous rule by the Republicans it is time to put aside political ambition
for the good of the country?
There also is a more personal reason. Events of the past two weeks have caused the
novice Palin to become the dominant female in the political life of this country. McCain
has already rankled Hillary by using her in his ads to persuade disillusioned Clinton
voters into supporting him. The cynicism was breathtaking. Here is an opportunity to
strike back. What is Sarah Palin but Hillary Lite, make that Very Lite?
Hillary has already indicated she is OK in debating the issues, but she doesn’t want
to get into a personal feud with Palin. That’s fine, but let’s remember it was Palin who
kept invoking Hillary’s name at rallies, as if she were some heir apparent to the
Clinton legacy. Ultimately Palin had to stop with her faux praise before Republicans
when they started booing any mention of Clinton.
It is not as if there aren’t any hard issues to hang around The Barracuda’s neck.
Hillary can start by asking whether voters would be willing to have the government force
their wives and daughters, who might be rape victims, to carry the baby to term. If that
isn’t the most repugnant form of government intrusion, one supported by Palin and the
right-to-life plank in the Republican platform, what is?
How about Palin’s opposition to equal pay for equal work legislation? How many women
are willing to accept lower wages than a man for equal work because they have the female
chromosome? You think Hillary would get some applause lines with that one?
Do you think the public is willing to continue the Bush policy of frustrating
stem-cell research? Well, Palin is against stem-cell research.
Is it unfair to point out Palin is for a gun policy that makes it harder to get a
driver’s license than a dangerous weapon?
Republican strategists have admitted they want this election decided on personality
rather than issues. I would too if I presided over two draining wars, high unemployment,
lack of universal healthcare, rising gas prices and falling stock markets. But Hillary
could help shift the campaign back to the issues where it belongs.
The way to do that is to combat the real-life symbol of the vacuous Republican
election strategy — Sarah Palin. And the best way to do that is to reel in Sarah
“Barracuda.”