The casino group wants an extension on two deadlines given over the summer before revealing its plans to the Gaming Control Board.
After seeking a two-year extension from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board to
set up shop on the waterfront, Foxwoods, which is required to have at least 1,500 slot
machines operating by May 29, 2011, filed a motion seeking a three-month extension to
submit its plans to the board.
When the two last met Aug. 28 to extend the license to build the casino, the board
asked that Foxwoods present a written plan by Oct. 16; submit all construction drawings
and a timeline for all phases of the facility by Dec. 1; finalize all financing by March
1; and update the board with monthly progress reports, according to board, which
announced nine conditions in all during the summer.
“To date, Foxwoods has only submitted a letter saying they still have no
plans, permits, or financing — but that they want more time to build a
temporary facility,” 1st District State Sen. Larry Farnese, whose district the
Delaware riverfront casino is in, said. “Foxwoods keeps showing up for class
and claiming the dog ate my homework. They’ve done nothing except hire
increasingly expensive lawyers.”
The motion filed Nov. 30 sets to extend the two conditions with Dec. 1 deadline as the
remaining have been or are expected to be completed on time. The architectural
renderings and timeline have not been completed and are awaiting a lock-in of
“the most critical hurdle” — the financers —
whose pending commitment will dictate the plans, according to the motion filed by
Foxwoods’ lawyers. Pending legislation allowing table games stalled the plans,
as well, and could alter the design and possible investor contributions, according to
the motion.
Foxwoods has reached out to 15 potential investors that are “unable to make
a final commitment without having an understanding as to what the final form of the
proposed legislations will be,” the motion stated.
The Senate bill allowing table games passed 29-20 in the Senate Oct. 9. The last
action in the House was Oct. 14, when it was referred to the Gaming Oversight Committee.
Area politicians, including Farnese and state Reps. Babette Josephs and Michael
O’Brien, are opposed to the extension.
“If there was ever a case of putting the cart before the horse, this is
it,” O’Brien, who serves on the oversight committee, said.
“The intent of the slots gaming law was to provide wage tax relief to
Philadelphians and property tax relief to homeowners, to save the state’s
horse racing industry and to boost economic development, not to protect the failed
proposal of a gaming applicant. Foxwoods was granted a license to operate slots, not
table games, and it should not be rewarded for failing to comply with the
law.”
The board gave one of two city licenses to Foxwoods three years ago with the other
going to SugarHouse, which is set to open an interim casino next year. After almost a
year of neighborhood resistance, Gov. Ed Rendell and Mayor Michael Nutter urged Foxwoods
to consider a location at Eighth and Market streets in September ’08. Foxwoods
agreed and, Aug. 28, asked the board to extend its license that expired in May and
approve the move. The board unanimously approved the former, but only if the slots
stayed in the originally approved Columbus Boulevard and Reed Street site. Now Foxwoods
hopes to push back submitting plans for that location until March 1 to coincide with the
funding deadline.
“This most recent action by Foxwoods is only the latest in a disturbing
trend of self-entitlement,” Josephs said. “The casino investors
think they can do what they want, when they want, where they want, all at the expense of
the state and surrounding neighborhoods. Foxwoods should have to follow the rules like
everyone else.”